Health

The Efficacy of Loratadine for Bone Pain in Cancer Patients

Summary

  • The bone pain that patients experience while on pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) is thought to be in part by increased histamine release within the bone during neutrophil replication and growth. Loratadine (Claritin), an antihistamine primarily used for seasonal allergies, has illustrated some benefits in combating this histamine-mediated pain.
  • Bone pain can be an undesired adverse effect of pegfilgrastim and other CSF (colony-stimulating factor) agents when used to treat neutropenia in cancer patients.
  • Bone pain can be so severe that patients choose to discontinue treatment with pegfilgrastim, putting them at an increased risk of infection due to their neutropenia.
  • The following research is provided using the results of two randomized phase 2 studies.

Clinical Data

A randomized phase 2 study was conducted that randomly assigned 587 breast cancer patients to receive prophylactic naproxen, loratadine, or no prophylaxis before receiving pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. [1] Those who received prophylactic naproxen were administered 500mg twice daily for 5 days in each chemotherapy cycle while those in the loratadine group were given 10mg once daily every morning for 5 days at the beginning of each cycle. Those in the pegfilgrastim group received 6mg of brand name pegfilgrastim, Neulasta, as a subcutaneous injection between 24 and 72 hours after the start of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint for the study was all-grade bone pain in cycle 1 from adverse effect reporting. Secondary endpoints included bone pain in cycles 2 through 4 and across all cycles. The cycles are based on cycles of chemotherapy that were associated with the use of pegfilgrastim. In cycle 1, all-grade bone pain was reported by 46.6% of patients in the no prophylaxis group (89/188), 40.3% (79/196) in the naproxen group, and 42.5% (85/200) in the loratadine group. All-grade bone pain was most frequent in cycle 1. The researchers used a reduction of bone pain by 10% in the groups treated with loratadine or naproxen vs the no prophylaxis group to mean statistically significant. In this study, the difference between the treatment groups and control groups was less than 10%, meaning that the difference was not statistically significant. The researchers do state however that the data collection of self-reported adverse effects of bone pain during cycles that can be 3 or 4 weeks apart may not be sensitive enough to detect a significant difference. I have included Table 3 from the study below for the reference of the severity of bone pain reported in each cycle throughout the groups

A second randomized phase 2 study evaluated the effect on loratadine for bone pain in patients using pegfilgrastim as well. [2] The researchers used two different treatment stages for the study. Oncology patients who received a dose of pegfilgrastim were placed in an observation stage while those of that group that developed significant back or leg bone pain were then enrolled in the treatment stage and randomized to receive either 10mg of loratadine daily for 7 days or placebo daily for 7 days. By the end of the study 213 patients were included in their analysis. Of the 213 patients, 46 were eventually placed into the treatment stage. Of the patients in the treatment arm, 77.3% observed clinical benefit with loratadine compared to 62.5% with placebo. However, with a p-value of 0.35, this is not statistically significant. In conclusion, the administration of prophylactic loratadine did not show to be clinically significant in decreasing severe bone pain in patients taking pegfilgrastim, however it is still commonly used in practice.

References

  1. Kirshner JJ, McDonald MC 3rd, Kruter F, et al. NOLAN: a randomized, phase 2 study to estimate the effect of prophylactic naproxen or loratadine vs no prophylactic treatment on bone pain in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(4):1323-1334. doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3959-2.
  2. Moukharskaya J, Abrams DM, Ashikaga T, et al. Randomized phase II study of loratadine for the prevention of bone pain caused by pegfilgrastim. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(7):3085-3093. doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3119-0.
James Vines

Recent Posts

All About Exploring Body Care Essential From Mists to Oils

Nowadays, prioritizing self-care has turned out to be more essential than ever. Amidst the chaos…

4 days ago

Acing English and Maths Tests: How Online Practice Tests Can Help Your Child Succeed

Test-taking is a fundamental aspect of a school student's life in Australia. From NAPLAN to…

4 days ago

Lockout Locksmith: Quick Solutions When You Need Them Most

Experiencing a lockout can be a stressful ordeal, whether it’s from your home, car, or…

7 days ago

The Value of Real Time Insights

A crucial aspect of harnessing real-time insights is leveraging integration between essential business tools, such…

1 week ago

AI 19 – The Innovative Technology Leading the Future of AI Image Generation

AI image generation is one of the fastest-growing fields in artificial intelligence. In South Korea,…

1 week ago

Why Invest in Watson’s Outdoor Patio Furniture in Kalamazoo?

Many homeowners in Kalamazoo find the process of creating the ideal outdoor living space to…

1 week ago